STATUS IS UPREADINESS PROFILE

Website readiness profile · Snapshot 23 October 2026

ranking.net

ranking.net's public homepage, certificate and DNS checked against 31 practices and compared with 190 Ratings & Reviews sites.

Readiness index
59/100

Ratings & Reviews median 66

Ahead of
30%

of measured Ratings & Reviews sites

Practices observed
16/30

1 of 31 could not be measured

Popularity band
Top 50K

Chrome UX Report top-sites list

Measured 2026-10-23 11:44:33 UTC from one location. How we measure

Readiness by lane

Green: ranking.net. Thin bar: Ratings & Reviews peer median.

Enable

87/100

Peers 82

Harden

45/100

Peers 54

Accelerate

53/100

Peers 68

Recover

0/100

Peers 6

Priority fixes for ranking.net

Ordered by impact and by how common each practice is among peers.

  1. Priority 1 · Harden

    TLS 1.3 negotiated

    Observed: The TLS connection negotiated TLSv1.2.

    Why it matters: TLS 1.3 removes legacy cipher suites and completes the handshake in fewer round trips, so it is both safer and faster for new connections.

    What to do: Enable TLS 1.3 on your CDN or server. Keep TLS 1.2 available for older clients unless you have checked your audience.

    88% of Ratings & Reviews peers do this. Limit: Certificate and protocol were observed from one vantage point; CDNs can present different certificates by region.

  2. Priority 2 · Accelerate

    Modern image formats in use

    Observed: The homepage had 241 images and none used WebP or AVIF.

    What to do: Serve WebP or AVIF with a JPEG or PNG fallback, either through an image CDN or by generating both formats at build time.

    37% of Ratings & Reviews peers do this.

  3. Priority 3 · Harden

    DMARC policy enforces quarantine or reject

    Observed: The DMARC policy for ranking.net was p=none, which asks receivers to take no action on failing mail.

    What to do: Publish DMARC with p=none and a reporting address first, fix any legitimate senders that fail SPF or DKIM alignment, then move to quarantine and finally reject.

    37% of Ratings & Reviews peers do this.

  4. Priority 4 · Accelerate

    No render-blocking scripts in <head>

    Observed: The homepage <head> loaded 1 external script without async or defer.

    What to do: Add defer to scripts that need the DOM, async to independent ones such as analytics, or move them to the end of the body.

    51% of Ratings & Reviews peers do this.

What ranking.net already does well

Practices fewer than half of Ratings & Reviews peers use.

  • Referrer-Policy setReferrer-Policy present.26% of peers
  • HSTS kept for at least a yearHSTS with a 730-day max-age covering subdomains.31% of peers
  • X-Content-Type-Options: nosniffnosniff header present.40% of peers

What we saw

Homepage checked
https://ranking.net/
Homepage response
HTTP 200
TLS
TLSv1.2, HTTP/2
Certificate
Amazon, 197-day validity, expiring 2027-03-06
DNS operators
Amazon Route 53
HSTS
max-age 730 days, includeSubDomains
DMARC policy
p=none
Homepage HTML
250 KB, gzip
Images on homepage
241 (png 234, jpg 7)

Limits: homepage only, one location, one moment. Header checks reflect the homepage response; other pages may differ.

Stack and providers

Seen in the homepage response, certificate and DNS. Provider pages compare how their customers configure the same checks.

All 31 checks

Select a gap for the method and fix. How each check works

Observed 16

  • HSTS kept for at least a year
  • Certificate has more than 14 days left
  • X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
  • Framing restricted
  • Referrer-Policy set
  • HTTP/2 negotiated
  • HTML compressed
  • Static files cached for 30 days or more
  • robots.txt published
  • XML sitemap discoverable
  • Canonical URL declared
  • Meta description written
  • Mobile viewport configured
  • Social preview image set
  • Page language declared
  • At most one redirect to the homepage

Not measured 1

  • HTTP requests move to HTTPS

Own ranking.net?

Re-run the checks after a change, or verify the site in a free workspace to save reports with history, compare against similar sites and competitors, and track a private action plan. What owners get.

Live status for this site: Status Is Down: ranking.net. This profile covers configuration only.

Compare with other Ratings & Reviews sites