STATUS IS UPREADINESS PROFILE

Website readiness profile · Snapshot 23 October 2026

nzdating.com

nzdating.com's public homepage, certificate and DNS checked against 31 practices and compared with 218 Dating Apps sites.

Readiness index
49/100

Dating Apps median 58

Ahead of
27%

of measured Dating Apps sites

Practices observed
13/31

0 of 31 could not be measured

Popularity band
Top 10K

Chrome UX Report top-sites list

Measured 2026-10-23 11:52:17 UTC from one location. How we measure

Readiness by lane

Green: nzdating.com. Thin bar: Dating Apps peer median.

Enable

56/100

Peers 71

Harden

43/100

Peers 52

Accelerate

53/100

Peers 53

Recover

0/100

Peers 7

Priority fixes for nzdating.com

Ordered by impact and by how common each practice is among peers.

  1. Priority 1 · Harden

    TLS 1.3 negotiated

    Observed: The TLS connection negotiated TLSv1.2.

    Why it matters: TLS 1.3 removes legacy cipher suites and completes the handshake in fewer round trips, so it is both safer and faster for new connections.

    What to do: Enable TLS 1.3 on your CDN or server. Keep TLS 1.2 available for older clients unless you have checked your audience.

    82% of Dating Apps peers do this. Limit: Certificate and protocol were observed from one vantage point; CDNs can present different certificates by region.

  2. Priority 2 · Enable

    XML sitemap discoverable

    Observed: No sitemap was listed in robots.txt or found at /sitemap.xml.

    What to do: Generate an XML sitemap of canonical URLs, reference it in robots.txt and submit it in Google Search Console.

    64% of Dating Apps peers do this.

  3. Priority 3 · Harden

    DMARC policy enforces quarantine or reject

    Observed: The DMARC policy for nzdating.com was p=none, which asks receivers to take no action on failing mail.

    What to do: Publish DMARC with p=none and a reporting address first, fix any legitimate senders that fail SPF or DKIM alignment, then move to quarantine and finally reject.

    42% of Dating Apps peers do this.

  4. Priority 4 · Accelerate

    No render-blocking scripts in <head>

    Observed: The homepage <head> loaded 7 external scripts without async or defer.

    What to do: Add defer to scripts that need the DOM, async to independent ones such as analytics, or move them to the end of the body.

    54% of Dating Apps peers do this.

What nzdating.com already does well

Practices fewer than half of Dating Apps peers use.

  • Referrer-Policy setReferrer-Policy present.17% of peers
  • Static files cached for 30 days or moreLong-lived caching on static files.35% of peers
  • X-Content-Type-Options: nosniffnosniff header present.40% of peers

What we saw

Homepage checked
https://www.nzdating.com/
Homepage response
HTTP 200
TLS
TLSv1.2, HTTP/2
Certificate
DigiCert, 366-day validity, expiring 2027-02-19
DNS operators
1 self-run or other nameserver domain
HSTS
max-age 90 days
DMARC policy
p=none
Homepage HTML
39 KB, br
Images on homepage
40 (gif 36, png 3, jpg 1)

Limits: homepage only, one location, one moment. Header checks reflect the homepage response; other pages may differ.

Stack and providers

Seen in the homepage response, certificate and DNS. Provider pages compare how their customers configure the same checks.

All 31 checks

Select a gap for the method and fix. How each check works

Observed 13

  • HTTP requests move to HTTPS
  • Certificate has more than 14 days left
  • X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
  • Framing restricted
  • Referrer-Policy set
  • HTTP/2 negotiated
  • HTML compressed
  • Static files cached for 30 days or more
  • robots.txt published
  • Meta description written
  • Mobile viewport configured
  • Page language declared
  • At most one redirect to the homepage

Own nzdating.com?

Re-run the checks after a change, keep a private action plan in a free workspace, or report a mistake.

Live status for this site: Status Is Down: nzdating.com. This profile covers configuration only.

Compare with other Dating Apps sites